 |
||||
| Rachel Zuckert | ||||
| Cambridge University Press | ||||
| 2007 | ||||
| English | ||||
| 409 pages | ||||
| 10.90 MB | ||||
[tab] [content title="Summary"] Here’s a rephrased version of your text, maintaining the original meaning while presenting it differently: --- I read this book as part of a graduate seminar on the philosophy of art, where Kant is a central figure in the theory of expression. What we now understand as aesthetics has only recently developed, and Kant outlines this shift clearly in his "Critique of Judgment," which is actually one of his more accessible works. The major advances in science and mathematics during Kant's time fundamentally reshaped our understanding of nature, and this shift marks a turning point. The modern scientific worldview, which critiques ancient thought, led to a divide between science and philosophy. As science began to interpret nature in a "mechanistic" way—free from "value" judgments—it seemed that nature could no longer account for values, leading to the belief that values are now located within humans themselves, rather than in nature. Beauty, as a value, thus becomes a concept in our minds. This theory of expression is rooted in the idea that beauty, like other values, resides in us. Kant agrees with this, especially in his "Critique of Pure Reason," where he discusses how modern science influences our understanding of the world. But when it comes to art, Kant doesn't rely on science. He starts by affirming that beauty is something we experience, and that such an experience tends to be compelling, not just a matter of personal opinion (unlike our preferences in food, for example). He then asks why we would even have such an experience. In answering this, Kant suggests that experiencing beauty offers the mind a special perspective on its own powers. This perspective, he claims, is free from the usual concerns and activities of everyday life, such as knowledge or worry. The aesthetic experience, according to Kant, is inherently subjective—it takes place in the human mind, not in the objective world. However, Kant also wants to make judgments about art, not just focus on individual subjectivity. He is searching for a "universal" character in aesthetic judgments, which goes beyond merely cataloging people's personal preferences. Kant argues that the human mind has an intersubjective principle, meaning that while aesthetic judgments are subjective, humans can still make valid, collective judgments about beauty. He contends that taste is not just about having a subjective opinion, but about having the competence to discern beauty. However, a key challenge is determining when we encounter something truly universal in art. Kant admits that aesthetic judgments cannot be argued in the same way as logical reasoning; aesthetics are subjective, but he believes it is possible to say, "This painting is beautiful," in a way that holds universal appeal. This brings Kant to the concept of "disinterest," which is central to his aesthetic theory. He argues that to experience beauty properly, we must be free from all normal interests. This means that when we engage with art, we must do so without any practical or personal stakes, seeing it purely for its own sake. This "disinterested" perspective allows us to appreciate beauty without being distracted by other desires or purposes. In fact, art has a special relationship to "disinterest" that sets it apart from objects used for practical purposes. For example, in ancient Greece, statues and temples were integrated into the public landscape, not placed in museums. Yet, these artworks still held a special status because they were perceived as distinct from ordinary objects. According to Kant, the concept of "disinterest" implies that art should not serve political or practical ends, as seen in the Soviet Union’s use of art to promote the worker’s revolution. Art, in Kant’s view, exists to engage us in an experience divorced from ordinary goals, purposes, and outcomes. He draws a distinction between subjective and objective universality: while aesthetic judgments are subjective, they still claim universality in that we can make judgments that transcend individual taste. One of Kant's key arguments is that all judgments of taste and beauty are singular. If a judgment is truly unique, it cannot fit neatly into a universal concept of beauty. There are no fixed rules or formulas for identifying beauty—only the possibility of making aesthetic judgments. In this sense, Kant suggests that art is different from everything else in that it doesn't rely on fixed principles or rules. Rather, it offers us pleasure in a way that is distinct from the satisfaction we get from meeting practical needs or gaining knowledge. Kant’s theory of aesthetic taste, therefore, centers on the idea that beauty is always a form of pleasure. This pleasure arises from the harmony of our cognitive faculties—the free play of imagination—which occurs when we engage with art. This play is not bound by logical rules, empirical facts, or practical needs. It allows the mind to experience a form of openness and freedom, which is what makes art pleasurable. Imagination plays a crucial role here. Kant believes that the free play of imagination is a key feature of beauty, as it allows the mind to conjure ideas that are not confined to the factual world. Art, in this sense, provides an opportunity for the mind to enjoy its cognitive powers independently of the constraints of science, logic, or practical necessity. This "free play" gives the artist considerable creative freedom, as they are not bound by the constraints of reality. The audience, too, is free from the usual modes of knowing. Kant also distinguishes art from other forms of knowledge by emphasizing that it is sensuous in nature. Art, he argues, is not about conveying knowledge or serving a practical purpose. Instead, it is a form of pleasure that arises from our engagement with its sensuous qualities—whether visual, auditory, or tactile. Art does not fulfill any practical needs or intellectual goals; it offers pleasure for its own sake. This pleasure is not chaotic or random; it arises from a harmonious relationship between the faculties of the mind. While Kant rejects the idea that beauty can be reduced to mere personal opinion, he also maintains that aesthetic judgments are not dictated by logic or science. They are subjective, but they also carry a claim to universality. Ultimately, Kant's aesthetic theory hinges on the idea of "disinterest" and the free play of imagination. The mind, when freed from the usual constraints of desire and knowledge, can engage with art in a way that is pleasurable, open, and free from practical concerns. This is the essence of Kant's theory of beauty: a unique form of pleasure that transcends ordinary interests and engages the mind in a special, harmonious way. --- This revision keeps the same main points but simplifies and streamlines the language to make it clearer and more concise. [/content] [content title="Content"] [/content] [content title="Author(s)"] [/content] [/tab]
[facebook src="bibliosciencesorg"/]
Key-Words: Télécharger Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the 'Critique of Judgment' EBOOK PDF EPUB DJVU . Download Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the 'Critique of Judgment' EBOOK PDF EPUB DJVU .
